[Case Study Revealed] ERP Implementation Costs in Real Figures — a ¥500,000 PoC, then Own the Entire Source Package for ¥6 Million (Open Source / ERPNext)

ERP implementation costs, in real figures. With heavy reuse of ERPNext's standard modules and thorough automation (CI/CD), total work time is roughly halved (600-700h to ~350h). A fixed-scope, fixed-price (¥500,000) PoC lets you verify usability with real data, then own the entire source package outright for ¥6 million (hands-on support ¥15,000/hour, maintenance from ¥50,000/month). A fully custom, done-for-you build runs from approximately 4.25 million yen.

10 min

Eye-catching image: Average cost of ERP implementation

1. The bottom line: what you pay, and what you get

Major ERPs cost tens of millions to hundreds of millions of yen. ERPNext.JP's model is different: buy out the entire source package for ¥6 million and own the system as your asset. No license fees, no per-user billing.

Our flagship offering is a source-package buy-out (¥6 million, for your own use). First, a fixed-price ¥500,000 PoC lets you confirm it truly works; once you're satisfied, we hand over the full source and 9 deliverables so the system becomes your own asset. From there, hands-on support (¥15,000/hour) and a maintenance subscription (from ¥50,000/month) keep your in-house development going.

Separately, this article also details a fully custom, done-for-you build (from approximately 4.25 million yen) as a model case — an option for customers who don't have in-house engineers. By reusing ERPNext's standard modules, applying a fixed design pattern, and automating verification (CI/CD), we compress an implementation that would normally take 600-700 hours down to about 350 hours, and reinvest the time saved into quality and on-site adoption.

💡 The full pricing picture: PoC ¥500,000 (fixed scope) → Source package ¥6,000,000 (buy-out, own all assets, an in-house-development launchpad) → Hands-on support ¥15,000/hour → Maintenance subscription from ¥50,000/month. See our pricing page and source-package guide. The "approx. ¥4.25 million" figures below refer to the fully custom, done-for-you build, not the buy-out.

What exactly do you "own"? ERPNext.JP is a three-layer stack. You own the top layer (your customizations); the standard ERP and framework below stay upstream and keep updating.

App-layer diagram: erpnext_jp (your customizations) / apps/erpnext (standard ERP) / apps/frappe (framework)
Fig. 1: The three-layer stack. You freely edit the top; the standard ERP and framework below are never edited directly and keep tracking upstream. A buy-out makes the whole thing your asset. (Diagram labels in Japanese.)

2. [Real-world example] Model quotation for a fully custom, done-for-you build (from ~¥4.25M)

Image of an ERP implementation

The example below is not the source buy-out (¥6M). It is a representative quote for a case where we build and roll out the system for you under a done-for-you engagement — an option for customers without in-house engineers.

This time, we will introduce a model case of how ERPNext can be used to implement "building a foundation for automated order processing, production quantity calculation (MRP), and cost visualization", which is a common request from medium-sized and small manufacturing companies (with 50 to 100 employees).

■ Project Requirements (Scope)

  • Target Operations: Order management, production planning (MRP), manufacturing performance management, cost management (material costs + process costs)
  • Main requests:
  • I want to automatically import order data from the e-commerce site.
  • We want to semi-automatically calculate the required quantities of necessary parts based on order information (MRP).
  • We want to know the exact manufacturing cost for each product.
  • Duration: Approximately 3-4 months (shortened by reusing ERPNext's standard modules and a fixed design pattern)

■ Cost Summary

TimeCost
Phase 1: PoC (Proof of Concept, fixed scope)approx. 100 hours¥500,000 (fixed price)
Phase 2: Production Transition and Stabilization Support250 hours¥3,750,000 (@¥15,000)
Total350 hoursTotal payment: ¥4,250,000 (excluding tax) and up

With traditional ERP vendors, a custom build of this scale would typically cost 600-700 hours and tens of millions of yen. By reusing ERPNext's standard modules (much of it doesn't need to be built), reducing rework with a fixed design pattern, and making verification fast and safe with automation (CI/CD), we've reduced the total work time to approximately 350 hours (about half). The hours saved are reinvested into "quality" and "on-site adoption."

If you have in-house engineers and want to grow the system yourself, we recommend the source-package buy-out (¥6M, own all assets) plus hands-on support and maintenance instead of this done-for-you build. See our source-package guide for details.


3. Why we can build it fast, affordably — and without breaking things

Bottom line: ERPNext specialists build with a fixed discipline of design and verification — which is why it's fast, affordable, and doesn't break. A build that normally takes 600-700 hours shrinks to about 350. Our engineers' standard rate is ¥15,000/hour; the PoC is a fixed ¥500,000 (billed separately from the source package). The reason it stays cheap without losing quality is the way it's built (AI is used as a supporting tool, but the leads are expertise, patterns, and automation). In plain terms:

① We never edit the standard core — we add via "hook points"

Editing the standard ERP core directly means you can't follow the upstream version upgrades, and things break with every update. ERPNext.JP never edits the standard core. Instead, your logic is registered into official extension points (hooks). The standard keeps updating; your customizations accumulate safely elsewhere — the golden rule of "never edit the standard core directly."

Diagram: hooks connect Core and Custom — the standard (read-only) calls your registered functions at lifecycle points
Fig. 4: The standard core calls your functions — registered in hooks.py — at lifecycle points. The core source is never changed. (Labels in Japanese.)

② Business rules live in the "right place" (layered design)

When display, entry points, and business rules are tangled together, fixing one thing breaks another. ERPNext.JP separates responsibilities into layers and concentrates business rules in a dedicated layer (Domain). Two payoffs: fixes are less likely to break other things, and the code isn't tied to one person — anyone can take it over.

Layered design diagram: Presentation / API / Domain (business rules) / Persistence / Integration
Fig. 3: Upper layers call lower ones, never the reverse. Business decisions live in Domain; the screen and entry points stay thin. (Labels in Japanese.)

③ A modern, robust foundation

ERPNext.JP runs on a production-grade stack — browser → Nginx → Python (Gunicorn) → database (MariaDB), offloading heavy jobs to a queue (Redis) — the same architecture thinking as enterprise systems. It isn't "simplistic just because it's open source."

Frappe runtime architecture: browser → Nginx → Gunicorn (Python) → MariaDB; async via Redis Queue → Worker; notifications via Socket.IO
Fig. 2: Synchronous work goes Gunicorn→MariaDB; heavy work goes to a queue (Redis)→Worker; notifications via Socket.IO. The single source of truth is the database. (Labels in Japanese.)

④ We don't mistake "it rendered" for "it works"

The scariest failure in software is something that used to work quietly breaking. ERPNext.JP stacks tests in layers and finally drives the real screen and database by hand. A "green" test can lie in three ways: a string existing in the source ≠ the screen actually renders; an element being present ≠ it works with the right data and permissions; a screen appearing ≠ the feature works (permission errors and post-save failures only show up when you actually operate it). That's why nothing breaks silently after delivery.

Test pyramid: static checks / unit (domain) / integration (API + DB) / visual acceptance & E2E
Fig. 5: Faster and more numerous at the bottom, slower and fewer at the top, with static checks as the base. Unit-only or screen-check-only leaves gaps. (Labels in Japanese.)

⑤ Thorough automation (CI/CD)

CI/CD means the moment you change code, it is automatically tested and released to production through a safe, fixed procedure. It lives in a pipeline (an automated flow), not in someone's runbook or memory. Locally, fast checks catch problems early; on the shared side, automatic gates and approval-based deployment structurally guarantee that "a broken change never reaches production."

CI/CD overview: local (static checks & tests) → automated gate (can't merge unless green) → approval-based deploy (staging automatic, production after human approval)
Fig. 6: Local → shared automated gate → approval-based deploy. Faster and more on the left, more careful and fewer on the right. A broken change can't move right. (Labels in Japanese.)

What it produces:

  • No key-person dependency: the procedure lives in the pipeline, not in one person's head — robust to handover and adding staff.
  • Broken changes don't reach production: if a test fails, it can't even proceed to merge or deploy.
  • Production release always requires human approval: accidental production deploys are forbidden by design.
  • You can always roll back: with backups assumed, you can restore to the moment before a problem.

Deployment is a two-stage design: "staging is automatic, production is only after human approval." Production and staging are fully separated — different site, different database, different credentials.

Deploy flow: release trigger → build → automatic deploy to staging → 👤 approval gate → production release (backups assumed)
Fig. 7: Build → automatic to staging → approval gate → production. Nothing reaches production without approval. (Labels in Japanese.)

Steps ①-⑤ — reuse of ERPNext's standards, a fixed design pattern, verification on the real system, and thorough automation. Stacked together, this is why the time is roughly halved without losing quality.

💡 The proof behind the trust: the design/verification discipline and the CI/CD described here are codified, not ad hoc. The source-package buy-out includes a Developer Guide and a CI/CD pipeline set as deliverables, so your own engineers can keep developing and operating at the same quality (you become self-sufficient). See our source-package guide.


4. A Fixed-Price "Proof of Concept" (¥500,000)—Why Go to Such Lengths?

Fixed-price PoC (Proof of Concept) - creating a sense of security.

ERPNext.JP's fixed-price PoC (¥500,000, fixed scope) is not just a simple discount campaign. This is a Proof of Concept (PoC) phase to bring the success rate of implementation closer to 100%.

Why can we fix both the scope and the price? That's because, with ERPNext's speed and our specialists, you can reach a conclusion on whether it's truly usable in a short, well-defined engagement.

We will not compromise on our professional quality standards until our customers are absolutely certain that "this will work!" We set the PoC at a fixed price so that customers who are serious about implementation and our team can engage seriously with each other.

■ The fixed scope of the PoC (4 items)

  • Fit & Gap analysis: Confirming how well your operations fit ERPNext.JP's standard features, identifying areas requiring additional customization, and improving the accuracy of estimates.
  • Master data migration trial: You run the migration yourself, and we inspect and validate the results.
  • Sample operation verification (3 scenarios): Confirm that core flows such as order placement to MRP (Material Requirements Planning) to actual manufacturing are functioning correctly.
  • Standard feature confirmation: Verify standard features on a working environment.

In other words, you can see a working prototype rather than just a theoretical proposal, and determine whether it's right for your company.

💡 Key Point: The PoC phase is a fixed price of ¥500,000 with a fixed scope. After seeing a "working prototype" and confirming the fit, you decide whether to proceed. The PoC and the source package (¥6M) are independent, separately billed items.


5. Detailed explanation of the breakdown of costs (what is included in a standard 350 hours)

"Even with these efficiencies, there's a certain amount of time that simply cannot be cut when implementing an ERP system." -- That's what we believe.

This involves fine-tuning to suit on-site usability and thorough support after the system goes live.

We are releasing details of a more reliable model case in which, out of a total of 350 hours of work, the engagement starts with a fixed-price "PoC" (Proof of Concept), followed by 250 hours of "production migration and adoption support".

[Phase 1] Fixed-Scope Proof of Concept — A period to verify "whether it's truly usable."

Fixed scopeDetails
Fit & Gap analysisConfirming how well your operations fit ERPNext.JP's standard features
Master data migration trialYou run the migration; we inspect and validate the results
Sample operation verification (3 scenarios)Core flows such as orders, MRP and manufacturing records
Standard feature confirmationVerify standard features on a working environment
Phase 1 Price¥500,000 (fixed price — no extra fees thanks to the fixed scope)

[Phase 2] Production Transition and Stabilization Support — A period to ensure successful implementation and stable operation in the field.

Work DescriptionEstimated TimePrice (Unit Price: 15,000 yen)
Detailed Custom Development
Complex report creation, e-commerce integration, custom UI implementation, etc.
90 hours¥1,350,000
Production Data Migration
Data migration from the current system with data cleansing
40 hours¥600,000
Operation Training
Key personnel training and thorough implementation in the field
40 hours¥600,000
Production Release Support
On-site supervision immediately after launch, handling of irregular issues
50 hours¥750,000
Post-implementation improvement support
Addressing "We want to do this more" requests that emerged after the system went live
30 hours¥450,000
Phase 2 Subtotal (Total Payment Amount, Excluding Tax)250 Hours¥3,750,000

*If you have specific requirements (such as complex API integration with external systems), a separate estimate will be provided. *If a site visit requiring business travel is necessary, actual transportation and accommodation expenses may be charged separately.


6. Why spend time on the "production transition" and beyond?

It is said that 80% of ERP implementation failures begin with rejection from the field immediately after release, with comments such as "It's not what we expected" or "It's difficult to use."

By reusing ERPNext's standards, a fixed design pattern, and automation, we dramatically reduced the time spent on the initial "configuration" and "code creation" phases. The time saved is then reallocated to the most crucial processes: "on-site implementation" and "improving usability."

This is intentional design.

  • Complete requirements definition without any setbacks in a fixed-price PoC.
  • In the "production phase", we refine it until the on-site team is satisfied.

Our approach isn't "implementation and then done," but rather "we'll support you until it's firmly established in the workplace." This is the investment allocation for a successful digital transformation (DX) proposed by ERPNext.JP.


Summary: "Fast, inexpensive, and high quality" — and "Until it takes root in the field"

Strengths of ERPNext.JPContent
Fast, non-breaking buildReuse of ERPNext standards + a fixed design pattern + automation (CI/CD): reducing traditional 600-700 hours of work to 350 hours
Own-it flagship planSource package ¥6M (buy-out, own all assets, an in-house-development launchpad) + maintenance subscription from ¥50,000/month
Fixed-price proof-of-conceptA fixed-scope PoC for ¥500,000, billed separately from the source package
Transparent FeesEven a fully custom, done-for-you build is approximately ¥4,250,000 (excluding tax) and up
Thorough on-site supportReallocate the time freed up to training and retention support

ERPNext.JP will support you from consideration to implementation and stabilization.

"Can we implement an open-source ERP system?" ERPNext.JP (MyHaTch) can help with those kinds of problems.

  • 🏭 We will listen to your company's business requirements and propose the optimal implementation plan.
  • 🎯 Start with a fixed-price PoC (¥500,000, fixed scope), beginning with proof-of-concept using real data.
  • 💰 Our flagship is the source-package buy-out (¥6M, own all assets) plus maintenance from ¥50,000/month; a fully custom, done-for-you build starts from approximately ¥4,250,000 — no additional license fees.
  • 📄 See our pricing page and source-package guide for the full breakdown.

We at MyHaTch provide support from the implementation to the operation of ERPNext. We provide support tailored to the needs of small and medium-sized manufacturing companies in Japan.

  • "What would the timeline and cost be like for our company?"
  • "I'd like to try it out with a fixed-price proof-of-concept first."
  • "I'd like to discuss how to proceed with the implementation."

👉 Start by exploring the feasibility of ERP implementation for your company with our free simulation. ERPNext.JP will fully support your company's first steps towards digital transformation.

📚

Related articles